Jan 28, 2026 5 min read

The Thesis Meets the Mainstream

Ethereum represents both convexity and asymmetric opportunity

Important: Please review the disclaimer at the end of this update.

Written Late January 2026

BlackRock's 2026 outlook makes something explicit that we've been building toward for months: Ethereum is the primary infrastructure for tokenization. Over 65% of tokenized assets currently settle on Ethereum. The world's largest asset manager is now publicly framing it as the "toll road" for Wall Street.

We see this as institutional consensus forming.

The migration we outlined in America's Great Financial Upgrade, the systematic movement of traditional finance onto blockchain settlement rails, is underway. The thesis we detailed in The Ethereum Inflection Point, that Ethereum represents a generational infrastructure shift, is no longer a contrarian position. It's becoming the baseline assumption for how major institutions are building.

What Forbes recently called "the $80 billion shift hitting Wall Street" is the tokenization of real-world assets, and Ethereum is where it's happening.

We see this moment as an opportunity defined by two dynamics: convexity and asymmetry. They describe the specific shape of the opportunity in front of us, and why we believe it favors patient, positioned capital.

Understanding Convexity

Convexity is the idea of getting an outsized return by owning the operators instead of the asset itself.

Consider gold. Over the last six months, gold (GLD) has returned approximately 70%. But gold miners (GDX) have returned 122%, a 1.75x multiplier. You get 75% more return for the same underlying move in gold.

This happens because of how the business economics work. A miner's costs are mostly fixed: equipment, labor, infrastructure. But revenue moves directly with gold prices. So when gold rises 25%, a miner's profit margin might jump 60% or more because costs didn't change. That margin expansion flows straight into earnings, and earnings flow into stock price.

This is the mechanical engine behind convexity. You're not just betting on the asset. You're betting on the operating leverage of businesses built around that asset.

Ethereum treasury companies work on a similar principle. These are publicly traded operators that hold substantial ETH on their balance sheets, and their equity valuations reflect not just the ETH they hold, but also their ability to deploy that asset, generate yield, and expand operations as the Ethereum ecosystem grows. As Nasdaq recently noted, these companies are following the playbook established by Bitcoin treasury companies, but with Ethereum's unique positioning as settlement infrastructure.

When ETH appreciates, these companies don't just see their treasury value rise. Their strategic optionality expands. Their ability to raise capital improves. Their relevance in the market increases. The stock can move more than the underlying asset because you're capturing both the asset appreciation and the business dynamics around it.

Convexity cuts both ways. In October, gold barely moved and GDX dropped 20%. The same leverage that amplifies gains will amplify losses when the underlying stalls or declines. This is why position sizing matters. You want exposure to the convexity without being overexposed to the downside leverage.

Understanding Asymmetry

Asymmetry is about the shape of possible outcomes, specifically when your potential upside is meaningfully larger than your potential downside.

Here's a simple way to think about it. Imagine you're a real estate developer evaluating a land deal. You put down $50,000 in earnest money to control a property. If the deal falls through due to zoning issues, financing problems, or other setbacks, you lose your $50,000. That's your bounded downside. But if the deal closes and you develop the property successfully, your profit might be $400,000 or more.

You're risking 1 to potentially make 8. Even if only three out of ten deals like this work out, the math still favors you because your wins are so much larger than your losses.

This is the engine behind asymmetric investing: you structure positions where the downside is defined and manageable, while the upside has room to be a multiple of what you risked.

Now apply this to Ethereum and ETH treasury structures.

The downside is anchored by real value. These companies hold actual ETH on their balance sheets, quantifiable, liquid, and verifiable. If the thesis takes longer to play out, if markets stay choppy, the treasury value provides a floor. You're not holding something that can go to zero on a bad quarter. You're holding exposure to an asset with known value and operators building around it.

The upside, however, has multiple ways to expand. If Ethereum becomes the dominant settlement layer for tokenized assets, which is the explicit direction BlackRock and other institutions are now building toward, the value of that ETH appreciates. But more than that, the companies holding it see their strategic position strengthen, their access to capital improve, and their valuations re-rate as the market recognizes what they own.

You don't need every element of the thesis to play out perfectly. You need enough of it to play out for the upside to significantly exceed the downside. That's asymmetry.

Why These Dynamics Are Converging Now

We see four reinforcing drivers coming together, not as separate bets, but as compounding forces:

Scarcity. Ethereum's supply is structurally constrained. Proof-of-stake and fee burns mean that marginal demand from institutional adoption competes with tightening supply. When new capital enters a scarce asset, prices can move disproportionately.

Narrative dominance. The "Ethereum as settlement infrastructure" story is no longer competing with dozens of alternatives for institutional attention. BlackRock, Fidelity, and other major players are building on Ethereum specifically. This concentrates capital flows rather than dispersing them.

Balance-sheet optionality. ETH treasury companies don't just hold a static asset. They hold strategic flexibility: the ability to deploy capital, generate yield, pursue acquisitions, or buy back stock as conditions evolve. A rising ETH price expands what these operators can do, which in turn can expand their valuations beyond simple asset appreciation.

Reflexive capital flows. Rising prices improve balance sheets. Stronger balance sheets attract more institutional interest. More interest drives more capital into the ecosystem. More capital reinforces the narrative and the price. This feedback loop can accelerate moves beyond what pure fundamentals might suggest.

These four drivers don't operate in isolation. They reinforce each other. Scarcity amplifies the impact of flows. Flows strengthen the narrative. The narrative attracts more capital to operators with balance-sheet optionality. And those operators benefit from the convexity we described above.

How We See the Opportunity

We believe Ethereum represents a structural shift in financial infrastructure, not a short-term trade. The institutional validation now emerging confirms the direction we've been positioned for.

We see this as an opportunity offering both convexity and asymmetry: exposure to operators with leveraged upside to Ethereum's success, anchored by real balance-sheet value that defines our downside.

This is not a guarantee. Markets are uncertain, timing is unknowable, and thesis development rarely follows a straight line. But we believe the structure of this opportunity, with bounded risk, multiple paths to outsized outcomes, and reinforcing drivers now aligning, represents exactly the kind of positioning we want in a portfolio.

Sources referenced:

Disclaimer: This document represents the views and analysis of Patriot Advisory Group and Quantum. It is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security or asset. Cryptocurrency and digital asset investments carry significant risks, including the potential for complete loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment decisions.

Insights from Mark Berube