The Ethereum Inflection Point

An Investment Thesis from Quantum Capital

Important: Please review the disclaimer at the end of this update.

Written Late December 2025

Welcome to the Quantum Letter. This post is being made public as an example of the research and analysis we produce for our members. For Patriot Advisory investors, you can claim your full access to the Quantum Letter to receive our regular investment updates, market insights, and special deep-dive pieces like this one. If you're new here, we hope this gives you a sense of the work we do at Quantum and we'd be glad to have you join us.

Setting The Table

We are at a pivotal moment in the evolution of Ethereum. What began as a cryptocurrency is undergoing a fundamental transformation into something far more significant: the infrastructure layer of the next-generation financial system. The thesis is straightforward; Bitcoin is stored value. Ethereum is infrastructure with yield.

This distinction matters enormously. While Bitcoin has established itself as digital gold, a store of value and hedge against monetary uncertainty, Ethereum is becoming the operational backbone upon which the future of finance will run. The regulatory clarity that has emerged in recent months, combined with historically low exchange supply and institutional positioning, creates a setup we believe represents one of the most asymmetric opportunities in the current market.

What follows is months worth of detective work alongside our bench of research partners to tell the story of the regulatory transformation, the supply dynamics, the institutional positioning, and the investment case we’re focused on at Quantum.

The Regulatory Transformation: A Timeline

The regulatory landscape for Ethereum has shifted dramatically. What was once an uncertain gray area has crystallized into a much clearer framework that positions Ethereum not as a speculative asset, but as legitimate financial infrastructure. This transformation did not happen overnight, it has been building for years and accelerated dramatically in 2025.

CFTC Recognition and Commodity Status

The foundation was laid in October 2019, when Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Heath Tarbert made an official declaration that would prove prescient: "It is my view as Chairman of the CFTC that ether is a commodity, and therefore it will be regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA)... It's my conclusion as Chairman of the CFTC that ether is a commodity and therefore would fall under our jurisdiction."

This position was tested and confirmed in July 2024, when Judge Mary M. Rowland of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued summary judgment explicitly declaring Ethereum to be a commodity subject to CFTC oversight. The court stated unequivocally: "the Court finds that there is no genuine dispute that Defendants transacted in cryptocurrencies that qualify as commodities under the CEA."

The practical implications of this classification became even cleaer on December 8, 2025, when Acting Chairman Caroline Pham announced the launch of a digital assets pilot program permitting Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USD Coin (USDC) to be used as customer margin collateral in derivatives markets. This is not merely symbolic, it means Ethereum can now be held as collateral in regulated financial markets, transforming it from a crypto asset into a recognized financial instrument with institutional-grade utility.

Tokenization of Traditional Assets

Perhaps the most significant development is the approval for U.S. stocks and treasury bonds to be tokenized and the infrastructure being built to execute this on the Ethereum network.

On December 11, 2025, the the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a No-Action Letter to The Depository Trust Company (DTC) permitting tokenization of stocks and real-world assets on blockchain for a three-year pilot period. The same day, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ( DTCC ) officially announced the scope: Russell 1000 equities, U.S. Treasury securities (bills, notes, bonds), and major index-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs), with service launch targeted for the second half of 2026.

Consider the scale: U.S. stock market capitalization stands at approximately $62-71 trillion as of 2025. U.S. Treasury securities outstanding total approximately $30 trillion as of October 2025. Combined, this represents roughly $90-100 trillion in assets that will increasingly settle on blockchain infrastructure.

The market is not waiting for this future, it is already being built. BlackRock's BUIDL Fund, the largest tokenized money market fund on public blockchains, holds $1.75 billion in assets as of December 2025. Franklin Templeton's BENJI fund holds over $851 million and was the first U.S.-registered mutual fund to use a public blockchain to process transactions and record share ownership when it launched in 2021.

Banking Integration

The walls between traditional finance and digital assets are not just lowering they are being dismantled by design.

On March 27, 2025, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) clarified the process for banks to engage in crypto-related activities, removing a significant source of regulatory uncertainty.

The decisive move came on December 12, 2025, when the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved national trust bank charters for five crypto firms: Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos. Circle and Ripple received de novo national trust charters; BitGo, Fidelity, and Paxos converted from state to federal charters.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released the official approval letter for Circle authorizes collateral trustee services for USDC holders, digital asset custody services for affiliates, and reserve management services under the National Bank Act, with the full authority and oversight that implies.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse stated: "The conditional approval of our trust bank charter represents a massive step forward, setting the highest standard for stablecoin compliance with both federal and state oversight."

The Clarity Act

The final piece of regulatory architecture is moving through Congress. H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, passed the House of Representatives on July 17, 2025 with a vote of 294-134, strong bipartisan support that signals this is not a partisan issue.

The bill establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, grants the CFTC jurisdiction over digital commodity transactions, and critically for Ethereum, would officially categorize Ethereum as a commodity rather than a security. The CFTC would have exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over spot market transactions in digital commodities on mature blockchains.

On December 19, 2025, White House AI and crypto advisor David Sacks announced that Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott and Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman confirmed committee markup for January 2026. Both Senate committees have released bipartisan discussion drafts, and while reconciliation between chambers will require work, the trajectory is getting even more clearer.

Current probability assessments place Senate passage at approximately 85%. This is the final piece of regulatory architecture that, once in place, removes virtually all remaining institutional hesitation…

The Supply Dynamics

While the regulatory narrative provides the "why," the supply dynamics provide the "how." The current exchange supply of Ethereum stands at approximately 8.6% in late december 2025, the lowest level since Ethereum's inception in 2015.

To understand what this means, consider an analogy: imagine there is only one home available for sale in a desirable neighborhood. Not three, not five…one. When demand arrives, there is no price discovery in the traditional sense. The price simply moves to wherever a seller is willing to part with their holding.

When we examine who holds Ethereum versus who is selling, the picture becomes even clearer. Institutions and large holders are accumulating and holding. The selling pressure is coming almost exclusively from retail participants often reacting to short-term price movements without visibility into the structural changes occurring beneath the surface.

This creates a coiled spring dynamic. When institutional demand arrives in force, whether from ETF inflows, corporate treasury allocations, or the need to hold Ethereum for tokenization infrastructure, there is simply not enough supply available on exchanges to absorb it without significant price appreciation. This is not a matter of opinion; it is a mathematical reality of the current market structure.

Institutional Positioning and Valuation

Institutional research coverage of Ethereum has matured significantly. Discounted cash flow models, the same valuation methodology applied to traditional equities are now being applied to Ethereum based on its role as infrastructure with yield generation capacity.

These models, which incorporate Ethereum's fee revenue, staking yields, and projected growth in network utilization from tokenization, produce price targets exceeding $9,000. It is worth noting that many of these models were constructed before the recent wave of regulatory approvals. The fundamental case has strengthened while the price has remained range-bound, a divergence that typically resolves in favor of fundamentals.

Our research partnership with Swiss Block, led by Henrik Zeberg, provides additional technical and cyclical context. The work suggests we are in the late stages of a corrective phase, with the structural setup for an impulsive move higher largely in place. The challenge, as always, is timing but the direction is getting increasingly clearer.

The Bitcoin Correlation and the Decoupling Thesis

A legitimate question investors raise: Ethereum has historically traded in tight correlation with Bitcoin. Why should we expect this to change?

The answer lies in what Ethereum is becoming versus what it has been. To date, Ethereum has traded like a cryptocurrency, subject to the same sentiment cycles, the same risk-on/risk-off dynamics, and the same correlation patterns as the broader crypto market. This made sense when Ethereum was primarily a platform for speculation and experimentation.

But Ethereum is no longer just a cryptocurrency. It is becoming regulated financial infrastructure. The tokenization of traditional securities, the banking integrations, the CFTC oversight, these developments change Ethereum's fundamental character. You do not value infrastructure the same way you value a speculative asset.

This does not mean the decoupling will be immediate or complete. Bitcoin will likely continue to influence Ethereum's price action in the near term. But as institutional adoption accelerates and Ethereum's utility as infrastructure becomes undeniable, we expect the correlation to weaken. Ethereum will increasingly trade on its own fundamentals; fee revenue, network utilization, staking yields, and the massive markets it serves as settlement layer.

In conversations with our research partners, the view has evolved from "Ethereum needs Bitcoin to rally" to "we don't need Bitcoin." This is a significant shift in thinking from analysts who have studied these markets for decades.

The Investment Case

The setup before us is unusual. We have:

A regulatory framework that has shifted from hostile to constructive, with major legislation passed and additional clarity imminent.

Exchange supply at decade lows, with institutional and whale holders accumulating rather than distributing.

Institutional valuation models pointing to price targets three times current levels, based on fundamentals that have strengthened since those models were built.

A fundamental transformation from speculative asset to financial infrastructure, creating the conditions for correlation breakdown with Bitcoin and crypto generally.

Liquidity conditions that are easing, with the Federal Reserve and Treasury providing support.

The challenge for any investor is that this type of information does not trickle down. 

Institutional-grade research, supply analysis, and regulatory interpretation require resources and access that most market participants simply do not have. The result is that retail participants are often selling into exactly the conditions that favor holding, reacting to price while missing the structural transformation occurring beneath the surface.

We cannot tell you when the market will recognize what we see. What we can tell you is that the conditions for a significant move are in place, that the fundamental value far exceeds current prices, and that waiting for confirmation will likely mean paying substantially higher prices.

Conclusion

In forty years of working in financial markets, across hedge funds, advisory practices, and every market cycle imaginable, this represents some of the most compelling work we have done. The convergence of regulatory transformation, supply dynamics, institutional positioning, and fundamental revaluation creates an asymmetric opportunity that is rare to encounter.

The market still prices Ethereum as a cryptocurrency. We believe it should be valued as infrastructure, infrastructure with yield, serving a hundred-trillion-dollar market. The gap between perception and reality is where opportunity lives.

Bitcoin is stored value. Ethereum is infrastructure with yield. This is the thesis. The regulatory architecture is built. The supply is constrained. The institutional targets are set. The question is not whether Ethereum reaches fair value it is whether you are positioned when it does.

Sources and Citations

CFTC Recognition and Commodity Status

1. CFTC Press Release 8051-19, "Chairman Tarbert Comments on Cryptocurrency Regulation at Yahoo! Finance All Markets Summit," October 2019. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8051-19
2. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, "Ether's Legal Status Clarified: CFTC Scores Win as Court Backs Agency's Commodity Classification," July 2024. https://quickreads.ext.katten.com/post/102jcc8/ethers-legal-status-clarified-cftc-scores-win-as-court-backs-agencys-commodity
3. CFTC Press Release 9146-25, "Acting Chairman Pham Announces Digital Assets Pilot Program," December 8, 2025. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9146-25

Tokenization of Traditional Assets

4. Bloomberg Law, "SEC Gives DTCC OK to Tokenize Stocks in Move to Blockchain," December 11, 2025. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/crypto/sec-gives-dtcc-ok-to-tokenize-stocks-in-move-to-blockchain
5. DTCC Official Press Release, "Paving the Way to Tokenized DTC-Custodied Assets," December 11, 2025. https://www.dtcc.com/news/2025/december/11/paving-the-way-to-tokenized-dtc-custodied-assets
6. Siblis Research, "Total Market Value of U.S. Stock Market," 2025. https://siblisresearch.com/data/us-stock-market-value/
7. SIFMA, "U.S. Treasury Securities Statistics," October 2025. https://www.sifma.org/research/statistics/us-treasury-securities-statistics
8. RWA.xyz, "BlackRock BUIDL Fund Data," December 2025. https://app.rwa.xyz/assets/BUIDL
9. RWA.xyz, "Franklin Templeton BENJI Fund Data," December 2025. https://app.rwa.xyz/assets/BENJI

Banking Integration

10. FDIC Financial Institution Letter, "FDIC Clarifies Process for Banks to Engage in Crypto-Related Activities," March 27, 2025. https://www.fdic.gov/news/financial-institution-letters/2025/fdic-clarifies-process-banks-engage-crypto-related
11. Banking Dive, "OCC Approves National Trust Bank Charters for Circle, Paxos, Ripple, BitGo, and Fidelity," December 12, 2025. https://www.bankingdive.com/news/occ-national-trust-bank-charter-approve-circle-paxos-ripple-bitgo-gould-crypto/807799/
12. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, "Preliminary Conditional Approval for First National Digital Currency Bank, National Association (Circle)," December 12, 2025. https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2025/nr-occ-2025-125a.pdf
13. Business Wire, "Ripple Secures Federal Approval to Establish National Trust Bank," December 12, 2025. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251212075832/en/Ripple-Secures-Federal-Approval-to-Establish-National-Trust-Bank

The Clarity Act

14. Congress.gov, "H.R.3633 - Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025," 119th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3633
15. Arnold Porter LLP, "Clarifying the Clarity Act," August 2025. https://www.arnoldporter.com/en/perspectives/advisories/2025/08/clarifying-the-clarity-act
16. Yahoo Finance, "Senators Set January Markup for Crypto Legislation," December 19, 2025. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/senators-set-january-markup-crypto-115418253.html
17. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, "Senate Crypto Market Discussion Draft Analysis," December 2025. https://www.dwt.com/blogs/financial-services-law-advisor/2025/12/senate-crypto-market-discussion-draft-analysis

Disclaimer: This document represents the views and analysis of Quantum Capital and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security or asset. Cryptocurrency and digital asset investments carry significant risks, including the potential for complete loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment decisions. The information contained herein is based on sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. Quantum Capital and its affiliates may hold positions in the assets discussed.